Apple’s EU rollout of iOS EU sideloading is now in effect, bringing alternative app marketplaces, new payment options, and browser engine changes to iPhone users in the bloc. The shift follows the EU’s Digital Markets Act, which requires gatekeepers to open up core platforms.
What changed under the DMA for iPhone
Apple introduced new pathways for app distribution in EU countries, including the ability for approved marketplace apps to install and update software outside the App Store. Apple also added support for alternative payment processing and allowed steering to external purchase links, subject to disclosures and design rules.
Apple described these moves as providing “new options for app distribution, payment, and browser engines” in an announcement detailing its DMA response. The company paired those options with fresh safeguards, such as app notarization, marketplace authorization, and enhanced malware defenses, because it argues these changes increase risk exposure. Apple outlined the package in a January 2024 Newsroom post that set the direction for iOS in the EU.
Developers can opt into new EU business terms. Those terms include lower App Store commission in some cases and the Core Technology Fee, a €0.50 charge per annual install over one million. Apple says the fee reflects platform and tooling costs, while critics warn large free apps could face new burdens.
Where iOS EU sideloading stands after DMA
Consequently, iOS added support for alternative app marketplaces and third-party payment flows in EU locales with the iOS 17.4 cycle, and Apple introduced a browser “choice screen” on first run. iPhone users in the EU can select a default browser from a wider panel and, importantly, developers can ship browsers using their own engines rather than WebKit in the EU.
The European Commission launched non-compliance investigations into several gatekeepers in March 2024, citing concerns about DMA adherence. Apple’s implementation drew scrutiny for its fee structure and rules around steering and marketplace eligibility, since those could shape how practical sideloading becomes. The Commission framed these probes as necessary to ensure “effective compliance.”
Regulatory oversight continues alongside developer experimentation. Some developers explored launching independent marketplaces, while others evaluated whether the Core Technology Fee changes their economics. The outcome matters because distribution power, user acquisition costs, and security expectations all shift with multiple store fronts.
What users and developers should watch next
Users in EU countries can choose to install marketplace apps that pass Apple’s authorization process. Apple still notarizes apps for malware checks and requires clear prompts before installation from outside the App Store, so users remain involved in each decision. These steps aim to preserve security signals, yet they also add friction that can influence adoption.
Developers weighing the new terms should model app scale and distribution mix. Apps with fewer than one million annual installs face no Core Technology Fee, so small teams may benefit from lower commissions without crossing fee thresholds. Large apps may need blended strategies across App Store and marketplaces, since costs can vary by channel and payment flow.
Browser vendors have new room to differentiate on performance and features because the EU now permits non-WebKit engines on iOS. That change could affect web app capabilities and developer tooling over time, as engine diversity often unlocks different APIs and optimization paths. Platform consistency may shift, so testing matrices could get more complex.
The latest developments and open questions
Apple’s DMA approach continues to evolve as feedback rolls in from developers, security researchers, and EU officials. The Commission’s investigations remain a key lever, and any formal findings could force revisions or clarifications. Apple has signaled it will adapt where required, yet it continues to emphasize security and privacy in its design choices.
Marketplaces will likely define the real-world impact. Strong curation, clear refund policies, and visible security practices can help users decide whether to trust a new storefront. Developers will watch discovery, analytics, and billing tooling closely, because those fundamentals determine whether alternative channels convert interest into sustainable revenue.
Users should expect more visible prompts and choices on first-run experiences, including browser selection and marketplace approvals. Over time, momentum will depend on app availability, exclusive content agreements, and how fees land across app sizes. The shape of competition on iOS in the EU will emerge gradually, but the direction is set by law.
Apple outlined its DMA changes in a detailed Newsroom post, and the European Commission centralizes legal context on its DMA portal. Reuters also reported on the Commission’s March 2024 non-compliance probes into Apple, Google, and Meta, noting the focus on steering and platform rules. These documents frame the stakes as companies, regulators, and developers navigate a new playbook.
In particular, “New options for app distribution, payment, and browser engines” is how Apple described the EU package, while the Commission underscored the need for “effective compliance.” The debate now centers on how those principles work in practice across real apps and stores.
- Apple’s EU changes overview: Newsroom announcement
- DMA legal background: European Commission DMA portal
- Regulatory scrutiny: Reuters on EU non-compliance probes
Related reading: OpenAI • Amazon AI • Generative AI