On August 14, 2026, the European Commission opened a public consultation for a new EU Strategy on victims’ rights, with submissions due by November 5, 2026, according to the European Union’s official portal. The call invites victims of crime, citizens, and practitioners to share concrete ideas. It’s a short notice window with long-run consequences for EU victims’ rights.
What the consultation asks—and why timing matters
The Commission is collecting feedback to shape its next multi‑year strategy on victims of crime. Responses are open to individuals and organisations. While the portal announcement is brief, the context is not: the current strategy ran from 2020 to 2025, setting priorities such as access to support, protection, and compensation. Background documents from the Commission explain that EU law already sets minimum standards through the Victims’ Rights Directive, and in 2023 the Commission proposed changes to strengthen those rights across the Union. Input now will feed both policy and the practical roll‑out of training, referrals, and digital tools over the next cycle.
Put plainly: this consultation is the best chance in years to tell Brussels where the system still fails, and what fixes can work in the field. That includes frontline details—response times, language access, and referral pathways—alongside cross‑border problems that only the EU can solve.
The biggest gaps left in EU victims’ rights
Research and monitoring show progress, but also patchy delivery. The EU Agency for Fundamental Rights has documented uneven access to victim support between Member States, with language barriers and late referrals a recurring theme. Commission evaluations also flag weak enforcement of information rights, long waits for compensation, and limited specialist help for children and survivors of gender‑based violence.
Four pressure points stand out for the next strategy:
- First contact and referral: Victims should be offered support quickly, ideally within days. In practice, referrals often arrive weeks later, or not at all. Clear targets for “time to first offer” and shared referral protocols could lift performance.
- Language and accessibility: Rights mean little if letters arrive in a language a victim can’t read or in formats they can’t access. The strategy can back multilingual templates, plain‑language standards, and funded interpretation.
- Cross‑border cases: When the crime, the victim, and the proceedings span different countries, procedures bog down. Streamlined evidence exchange and a simple path to state compensation across borders would cut delays.
- Digital and online harms: Stalking, image‑based abuse, and fraud leave digital trails, yet reporting tools and preservation orders vary widely. Common e‑evidence workflows and survivor‑centric takedown processes would help police act faster.
None of this requires reinventing EU law from scratch. It needs sharper delivery, better data sharing, and the budget to scale what works. That’s where targeted feedback can move the needle.
Who should respond—and what a strong submission looks like
Victims of crime, support NGOs, prosecutors, police, bar associations, court administrators, health services, city governments, and tech platforms all have pieces of the picture. The online form is open to each of these groups. To be persuasive, submissions should go beyond principles and focus on implementation detail the Commission can turn into measures for EU victims’ rights.
- Quantify the gap: Share hard numbers—wait times for first contact, drop‑off rates after police reports, interpreter shortages by language, or average months to compensation. If you have only a sample, say so.
- Map the journey: Outline a real cross‑border case from report to closure. Name the hand‑offs, the delays, and the dead ends. Suggest one EU‑level fix for each choke point.
- Show costs and savings: Attach basic costings for what you propose. A one‑page budget for a 24/7 hotline, or training curriculum hours, helps the Commission link policy with funding.
- Set measurable targets: Propose 2–3 KPIs that any Member State could report quarterly, such as “offer of support within 48 hours” or “percentage of victims receiving case updates in their chosen language.”
- Bring pilot evidence: If you’ve tested a digital reporting form, a survivor advocate model, or rapid compensation triage, include outcome data and a short implementation guide.
If you need background, the Commission’s pages on the directive and its proposed update outline the legal baseline. The 2020–2025 strategy shows how Brussels framed priorities in the last cycle and helps identify what stayed stuck. Linking your ideas to those documents makes it easier for policymakers to slot solutions into the next plan.
What this could change—laws, funding, and practice
Once the consultation closes on November 5, 2026, the Commission will sift input and draft the new strategy. While timelines and titles may shift, the playbook is familiar: set a few headline goals, back them with legislative fine‑tuning where needed, and then fund delivery through EU programmes. Expect the Citizens, Equality, Rights and Values programme—CERV—to remain the main pot for scaling services and training. That’s why costed, ready‑to‑scale proposals matter.
There’s also a signal to national justice systems. If the Commission hears broad support for common KPIs or standard forms, those can become benchmarks in guidance and peer reviews. That tends to move practice faster than law alone. For smaller Member States and under‑resourced regions, shared templates, pooled training material, and EU‑hosted digital tools can close gaps without heavy new spending.
This round is also a chance to fit services to newer crime patterns. Online abuse, deepfake threats, and tech‑enabled stalking cross borders by design. Coordinated takedown protocols and fast e‑evidence preservation—paired with trauma‑informed victim contact—would make rights real in these cases. Submissions that show how to do this at scale will land well.
The Commission’s home page makes the ask simple. The value comes from what fills the form: field data, sharp targets, and workable budgets. With that, the next plan for EU victims’ rights can shift from words to measurable results—and give victims faster support, clearer information, and fairer outcomes across the Union. For more on this, see bloomberg.com and nytimes.com.
Related reading: AI in Education • Data Privacy • AI in Society